LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gores Holdings, Inc. (“Gores Holdings”) (NASDAQ CM: GRSHU, GRSH, GRSHW),
a special purpose acquisition company sponsored by an affiliate of The
Gores Group, LLC (“The Gores Group” or “Gores”), today announced that it
completed the acquisition of Hostess Brands, LLC (“Hostess Brands”), the
maker of Hostess® Twinkies®, Ding Dongs®
and CupCakes. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the
Boards of Directors of both Gores Holdings and the indirect parent of
Hostess Brands, and was approved at a special meeting of Gores Holdings’
shareholders on November 3, 2016. In connection with the transaction,
Gores Holdings has been renamed Hostess Brands, Inc. (“Hostess” or “the
Company”), and its common stock and warrants will trade on NASDAQ under
the symbols “TWNK” and “TWNKW”, respectively.
As previously announced, along with the $375 million of Gores Holdings’
shareholder equity, additional investors comprising large institutional
investors, C. Dean Metropoulos (through $50 million of additional
rollover contribution) and Gores affiliates participated in a $350
million private placement, led by Alec Gores, Chairman and CEO of The
Gores Group. Additionally, funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Global
Management, LLC (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Apollo”)
(NYSE: APO) and C. Dean Metropoulos and family, the prior majority
owners of Hostess, will continue to hold an approximately 42% combined
stake in the Company. Dean Metropoulos and William Toler continue to
lead Hostess as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
respectively.
Dean Metropoulos, Executive Chairman of Hostess, stated, “We are excited
to introduce Hostess as a public company and I am extremely proud of the
job our team has done in repositioning and growing Hostess during the
past four years. I believe the Company has strong growth potential and
can think of no one better to partner with in this next journey than
Alec Gores and the Gores team who have a well-earned reputation for not
only identifying, but adding value to the businesses with which they
affiliate.”
Alec Gores, Chairman and CEO of The Gores Group, said, “Hostess and its
best-known product are the epitome of American icons. Dean, Bill and
their team have done an outstanding job of positioning the Company for
future, profitable growth. We are thrilled to be part of the next stage
in this Company’s life and look forward to helping create value for our
shareholders.”
Andrew Jhawar, Senior Partner and Head of the Consumer & Retail Group at
Apollo, added, “Hostess has many exciting levers for continued growth
going forward, and the Company is well positioned given its strong
leadership, dedicated team members and loyal customer base. Becoming a
public company is the next evolution in the revitalization of Hostess.
Our team at Apollo looks forward to working with the Gores team, the
Company’s new Board members and Dean, Bill and the rest of the
management team in assisting to drive profitable growth and future
shareholder value at Hostess.”
In 2013, C. Dean Metropoulos and certain funds affiliated with Apollo
acquired select Hostess assets out of the liquidation of the old Hostess
Brands company. That summer, they returned Hostess products to store
shelves after a months-long absence in what became one of the biggest
news stories of the year. Since that time, the management team has
successfully rebuilt the business and the brand through investments to
enhance operations, creative product innovation, expanded distribution
through a direct-to-warehouse system, targeted acquisitions and a
competitive business model. Hostess had revenues for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2016 of approximately $658 million and operates five
baking facilities located in Emporia, KS, Indianapolis, IN, Columbus, GA
and Southbridge, MA.
Upon completion of the transaction, the Hostess Board of Directors
consists of Dean Metropoulos, Mark Stone, Andrew Jhawar, Larry Bodner,
Neil Defeo, Jerry Kaminski and Craig Steeneck.
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. acted as lead capital markets advisor and
financial advisor, Moelis & Company and Morgan Stanley acted as
joint-capital markets advisors and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP acted as
legal advisor to Gores Holdings. Rothschild Inc., Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and Perella Weinberg Partners LP acted as M&A
advisors to Hostess Brands. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP acted as legal
advisor to Apollo and Hostess Brands. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison LLP acted as legal advisor and UBS acted as financial advisor
to Dean Metropoulos and his family.
About Hostess Brands, Inc.
Hostess is one of the largest packaged food companies focused on
developing, manufacturing, marketing, selling and distributing fresh
baked sweet goods in the United States. The brand’s history dates back
to 1919, when the Hostess CupCake was introduced to the public, followed
by Twinkies® in 1930. Today, Hostess produces a variety of
new and classic treats including Ding Dongs®, Ho Hos®,
Donettes® and Fruit Pies, in addition to Twinkies®
and CupCakes.
For more information about Hostess products and Hostess Brands, please
visit hostesscakes.com.
Follow Hostess on Twitter: @Hostess_Snacks;
on Facebook: facebook.com/Hostess;
on Instagram: Hostess_Snacks;
and on Pinterest: pinterest.com/hostesscakes.
About Gores Holdings, Inc.
Gores Holdings is a special purpose acquisition company sponsored by an
affiliate of The Gores Group, for the purpose of effecting a merger,
capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or similar business combination with one or more
businesses. Gores Holdings completed its initial public offering in
August 2015, raising approximately $375 million in cash proceeds. Gores
Holdings’ officers and certain of its directors are affiliated with The
Gores Group. Founded in 1987 by Alec Gores, The Gores Group is a global
investment firm focused on acquiring controlling interests in mature and
growing businesses which can benefit from the firm's operating
experience and flexible capital base. Over its nearly 30 year history,
The Gores Group has become a leading investor having demonstrated a
reliable track record of creating value in its portfolio companies
alongside management. Headquartered in Los Angeles, The Gores Group
maintains offices in Boulder, CO, and London. For more information,
please visit www.gores.com.
About Apollo Global Management, LLC
Apollo (NYSE: APO) is a leading global alternative investment manager
with offices in New York, Los Angeles, Houston, Chicago, Bethesda,
Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Madrid, Luxembourg, Singapore, Mumbai,
Delhi, Shanghai and Hong Kong. Apollo had assets under management of
approximately $189 billion as of September 30, 2016, in private equity,
credit and real estate funds invested across a core group of nine
industries where Apollo has considerable knowledge and resources. For
more information about Apollo, please visit www.agm.com.
About Metropoulos & Co.
Metropoulos & Co. is a merchant banking and management firm focused
principally on the food and consumer sectors in the United States and
Europe. Dean Metropoulos and his management team partners have been
involved in more than 83 acquisitions with over $20 billion of aggregate
transaction value. Companies where Metropoulos & Co. has been an
investor and Dean Metropoulos has been an executive include: Pabst
Brewing Company, Pinnacle Foods, Aurora Foods, Stella Foods, The
Morningstar Group, International Home Foods, Ghirardelli Chocolates,
Mumm and Perrier Jouet Champagnes and Hillsdown Holdings, PLC (Premier
International Foods, Burtons Biscuits and Christie Tyler Furniture),
among others.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contain statements reflecting our views about our
future performance that constitute “forward-looking statements” within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that
involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements
are generally identified through the inclusion of words such as
“believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,”
“anticipates,” “will,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” or similar language.
Statements addressing our future operating performance and statements
addressing events and developments that we expect or anticipate will
occur are also considered as forward-looking statements. All forward
looking statements included herein are made only as of the date hereof.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or
otherwise.
Friday, November 11, 2016
Hostess Brands, Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results for Hostess Holdings, L.P.
KANSAS CITY, Mo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hostess Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: TWNK, TWNKW)(the “Company”), one of the
largest manufacturers and marketers of sweet baked goods including
Twinkies®, Ding Dongs®, Ho Hos®, Donettes® and a variety of new and
classic treats, today reported third quarter ended September 30, 2016
financial results for its subsidiary Hostess Holdings, L.P. (“Hostess”).
Third quarter 2016 financial results for Hostess reflect the three months ended September 30, 2016, prior to the closing of the recent business combination (the “Business Combination”) between Hostess and the Company (f.k.a.Gores Holding, Inc.) which occurred on November 4, 2016. In connection with the closing of the Business Combination, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Hostess Holdings, L.P. and changed its name to Hostess Brands, Inc.
Third Quarter Financial Highlights
“We are very pleased with Hostess’s third quarter financial results which are evidence of the successful execution of our strategy to continue to build out our whitespace distribution opportunities and enhance our product assortment through innovation and new product development,” commented Bill Toler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. “The completion of our merger with the Gores team marks an exciting milestone in Hostess’s history as we take another meaningful step forward in our business evolution. We believe Hostess has significant potential to leverage our well-established sweet baked goods brand portfolio to drive continued sales growth, profitability and value for our shareholders.”
Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results
Net revenues were $196.2 million, an increase of $38.0 million or 24.0%, compared to net revenues of $158.2 million for the third quarter of 2015 primarily due to an increase in the number of cases sold as a result of increased distribution in convenience and drug channels and expanded product offerings. Superior Cake Products, Inc. (“Superior”) acquired by Hostess on May 10, 2016, contributed $9.7 million in net revenues for third quarter of 2016. Sweet Baked Goods represented 88.7% and Other represented 11.3% of net revenues, respectively.
Gross profit was $86.6 million, or 44.1% of net revenues, compared to gross profit of $59.6 million, or 37.7% of net revenues, for the third quarter of 2015. After excluding a $4.0 million credit to recall costs related to flour and $2.6 million of incentive compensation third quarter of 2016 gross profit was $85.2 million, or 43.4% of net revenues. Ingredient costs were higher as a percentage of net revenues for the third quarter of 2015, primarily due to the reduced available egg supplies, which increased the egg ingredient prices to record highs.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $29.1 million, an increase of $5.4 million, as compared to SG&A of $23.7 million for the third quarter of 2015. The increase in SG&A expenses were primarily attributable to increases in field marketing, increases in annual incentive compensation related to increases in operating performance, professional fees and the addition of Superior.
GAAP net income was $33.5 million compared to a net loss of $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2015.
Adjusted EBITDA was $55.6 million, an increase of $14.9 million, or 36.6%, compared to adjusted EBITDA of $40.7 million for the third quarter of 2015. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2016 was 28.4% of net revenues, compared to adjusted EBITDA of 25.7% of net revenues in the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA is non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to the tables in this press release for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.
Segment Review
Hostess has two reportable segments: Sweet Baked Goods and Other. The Sweet Baked Goods segment consists of sweet baked goods and the Other segment consists of branded bread, buns and in-store bakery products. Please refer to the tables in this press release for segment financial disclosures.
Sweet Baked Goods Segment: Net revenues for quarter were $174.0 million, an increase of $19.6 million, or 12.7%, compared to net revenues of $154.4 million for the third quarter of 2015. Gross profit was $79.7 million, or 45.8% of net revenues, compared to gross profit of $58.4 million, or 37.8% of net revenues for the third quarter of 2015.
Other Segment: Net revenues for quarter were $22.2 million, an increase of $18.5 million, or 502.6%, compared to net revenues of $3.7 million for the third quarter of 2015. Gross profit was $6.9 million, or 31.1% of net revenues, compared to gross profit of $1.2 million, or 32.4% of net revenues for the third quarter of 2015.
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow
As of September 30, 2016, Hostess had cash and cash equivalents of $64.2 million and approximately $97.2 million available for borrowing, net of letters of credit, under its revolving line of credit. Following the completion of the Business Combination on November 4, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7.5 million and net debt of $991.8 million.
Hostess has two reportable segments: Sweet Baked Goods and Other. The
Sweet Baked Goods segment consists of sweet baked goods that are sold
under the Hostess® and Dolly Madison brands. In April 2015, Hostess
launched Hostess® branded bread and buns. As a result, Hostess added a
reportable segment called Other, to include Hostess® branded bread and
bun products. In May 2016, Hostess purchased Superior, which
manufactures and distributes eclairs, madeleines, brownies, and iced
cookies in the “In-Store Bakery” section of grocery and club retailers.
The operations of Superior have been included in the reportable segment
called Other. The Hostess® branded bread and buns operating segment, the
In-Store Bakery operating segment, and other were aggregated and
presented within Other as a result of not meeting the 10 percent
quantitative threshold tests in accordance with FASB ASC 280-10-50-12.
Hostess evaluates performance and allocates resources based on net revenue and gross profit. Information regarding the operations of these reportable segments is as follows:
Third quarter 2016 financial results for Hostess reflect the three months ended September 30, 2016, prior to the closing of the recent business combination (the “Business Combination”) between Hostess and the Company (f.k.a.Gores Holding, Inc.) which occurred on November 4, 2016. In connection with the closing of the Business Combination, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Hostess Holdings, L.P. and changed its name to Hostess Brands, Inc.
Third Quarter Financial Highlights
-
Net revenues increased 24.0% to $196.2 million
- Sweet Baked Goods (sweet baked products) net revenues increased 12.6% to $174.0 million
- Other (bread, buns and in-store bakery products) net revenues increased 502.6% to $22.2 million
-
Gross margin improved 640 basis points to 44.1%
- Sweet Baked Goods gross margin was 45.8%
- Other gross margin was 31.0%
- GAAP net income was $33.5 million, up from a net loss of $4.1 million
- Adjusted EBITDA grew 36.7% year-over-year to $55.6 million
“We are very pleased with Hostess’s third quarter financial results which are evidence of the successful execution of our strategy to continue to build out our whitespace distribution opportunities and enhance our product assortment through innovation and new product development,” commented Bill Toler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. “The completion of our merger with the Gores team marks an exciting milestone in Hostess’s history as we take another meaningful step forward in our business evolution. We believe Hostess has significant potential to leverage our well-established sweet baked goods brand portfolio to drive continued sales growth, profitability and value for our shareholders.”
Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results
Net revenues were $196.2 million, an increase of $38.0 million or 24.0%, compared to net revenues of $158.2 million for the third quarter of 2015 primarily due to an increase in the number of cases sold as a result of increased distribution in convenience and drug channels and expanded product offerings. Superior Cake Products, Inc. (“Superior”) acquired by Hostess on May 10, 2016, contributed $9.7 million in net revenues for third quarter of 2016. Sweet Baked Goods represented 88.7% and Other represented 11.3% of net revenues, respectively.
Gross profit was $86.6 million, or 44.1% of net revenues, compared to gross profit of $59.6 million, or 37.7% of net revenues, for the third quarter of 2015. After excluding a $4.0 million credit to recall costs related to flour and $2.6 million of incentive compensation third quarter of 2016 gross profit was $85.2 million, or 43.4% of net revenues. Ingredient costs were higher as a percentage of net revenues for the third quarter of 2015, primarily due to the reduced available egg supplies, which increased the egg ingredient prices to record highs.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses were $29.1 million, an increase of $5.4 million, as compared to SG&A of $23.7 million for the third quarter of 2015. The increase in SG&A expenses were primarily attributable to increases in field marketing, increases in annual incentive compensation related to increases in operating performance, professional fees and the addition of Superior.
GAAP net income was $33.5 million compared to a net loss of $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2015.
Adjusted EBITDA was $55.6 million, an increase of $14.9 million, or 36.6%, compared to adjusted EBITDA of $40.7 million for the third quarter of 2015. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2016 was 28.4% of net revenues, compared to adjusted EBITDA of 25.7% of net revenues in the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA is non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to the tables in this press release for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.
Segment Review
Hostess has two reportable segments: Sweet Baked Goods and Other. The Sweet Baked Goods segment consists of sweet baked goods and the Other segment consists of branded bread, buns and in-store bakery products. Please refer to the tables in this press release for segment financial disclosures.
Sweet Baked Goods Segment: Net revenues for quarter were $174.0 million, an increase of $19.6 million, or 12.7%, compared to net revenues of $154.4 million for the third quarter of 2015. Gross profit was $79.7 million, or 45.8% of net revenues, compared to gross profit of $58.4 million, or 37.8% of net revenues for the third quarter of 2015.
Other Segment: Net revenues for quarter were $22.2 million, an increase of $18.5 million, or 502.6%, compared to net revenues of $3.7 million for the third quarter of 2015. Gross profit was $6.9 million, or 31.1% of net revenues, compared to gross profit of $1.2 million, or 32.4% of net revenues for the third quarter of 2015.
Balance Sheet and Cash Flow
As of September 30, 2016, Hostess had cash and cash equivalents of $64.2 million and approximately $97.2 million available for borrowing, net of letters of credit, under its revolving line of credit. Following the completion of the Business Combination on November 4, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7.5 million and net debt of $991.8 million.
HOSTESS HOLDINGS, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
ASSETS | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 64,220 | $ | 64,473 | ||||
Restricted cash | 8,215 | 4,655 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 58,853 | 38,860 | ||||||
Inventories | 29,280 | 25,130 | ||||||
Assets held for sale | — | 4,000 | ||||||
Prepaids and other current assets | 11,550 | 2,041 | ||||||
Total current assets | 172,118 | 139,159 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net | 147,025 | 128,078 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 9,010 | 17,225 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net | 291,947 | 263,579 | ||||||
Goodwill | 81,575 | 56,992 | ||||||
Deferred finance charges | 1,422 | 1,696 | ||||||
Other assets, net | 7,569 | 7,142 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 710,666 | $ | 613,871 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligation payable within one year | $ | 9,401 | $ | 9,250 | ||||
Accounts payable | 46,660 | 28,053 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 24,880 | 20,577 | ||||||
Deferred distributions to partners | 8,215 | 4,655 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 538 | 565 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 89,694 | 63,100 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligation | 1,189,542 | 1,193,667 | ||||||
Deferred distributions to partners | 9,010 | 17,225 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability | 11,457 | — | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,299,703 | 1,273,992 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Partners’ deficit | (554,601 | ) | (622,130 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interest | (34,436 | ) | (37,991 | ) | ||||
Total liabilities and partners’ deficit | $ | 710,666 | $ | 613,871 | ||||
HOSTESS HOLDINGS, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
September 30,
2016 |
September 30,
2015 |
September 30,
2016 |
September 30,
2015 |
||||||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 196,197 | $ | 158,213 | $ | 548,758 | $ | 473,789 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold | 113,618 | 95,942 | 309,461 | 269,997 | |||||||||||
Recall costs related to flour | (4,000 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Special employee incentive compensation | — | 2,649 | — | 2,649 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 86,579 | 59,622 | 239,297 | 201,143 | |||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Advertising and marketing | 10,381 | 9,096 | 27,529 | 25,101 | |||||||||||
Selling expense | 8,271 | 7,242 | 23,175 | 22,783 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 10,437 | 7,367 | 31,442 | 24,250 | |||||||||||
Amortization of customer relationships | 503 | 155 | 1,003 | 467 | |||||||||||
Special employee incentive compensation | — | 1,274 | — | 1,274 | |||||||||||
Impairment of property and equipment | — | 1,525 | 7,300 | 1,950 | |||||||||||
Loss on sale/abandonment of property and equipment and bakery shutdown costs | 213 | 90 | 440 | 1,005 | |||||||||||
Related party expenses | 1,058 | 1,236 | 3,432 | 3,700 | |||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 30,863 | 27,985 | 94,321 | 80,530 | |||||||||||
Operating income | 55,716 | 31,637 | 144,976 | 120,613 | |||||||||||
Other expense: | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 18,004 | 14,136 | 53,748 | 31,806 | |||||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 18,121 | — | 25,880 | |||||||||||
Other (income) expense | 4,222 | 3,444 | 9,411 | (8,680 | ) | ||||||||||
Total other expense | 22,226 | 35,701 | 63,159 | 49,006 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 33,490 | (4,064 | ) | 81,817 | 71,607 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | (23 | ) | — | 294 | — | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 33,513 | (4,064 | ) | 81,523 | 71,607 | ||||||||||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest | 2,329 | (204 | ) | 4,110 | 3,580 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Hostess Holdings, L.P. | $ | 31,184 | $ | (3,860 | ) | $ | 77,413 | $ | 68,027 |
HOSTESS HOLDINGS, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2016
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2015
|
||||||||
Operating activities | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 81,523 | $ | 71,607 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 9,054 | 7,158 | |||||||
Impairment of property and equipment | 7,300 | 1,950 | |||||||
Non-cash interest expense-debt fee amortization | 2,486 | 2,547 | |||||||
Non-cash loss on debt extinguishment | — | 16,005 | |||||||
Unit-based compensation | 689 | 1,264 | |||||||
Gain on sale/abandonment of property and equipment | (153 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities | |||||||||
Accounts receivable | (17,871 | ) | (10,469 | ) | |||||
Inventories | (1,850 | ) | (3,129 | ) | |||||
Prepaids and other current assets | (9,397 | ) | (792 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 17,335 | 25,941 | |||||||
Other | 397 | 316 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 89,513 | 112,377 | |||||||
Investing activities | |||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (23,995 | ) | (22,306 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of Superior, net of cash | (50,091 | ) | — | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 4,350 | 409 | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities | — | 42,960 | |||||||
Restricted cash release | — | 1,762 | |||||||
Acquisition and development of software assets | (1,917 | ) | (1,745 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (71,653 | ) | 21,080 | ||||||
Financing activities | |||||||||
Repayments of debt and capital lease obligation | (6,985 | ) | (496,250 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — | 1,225,000 | |||||||
Debt fees | — | (22,819 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to partners | (10,573 | ) | (952,875 | ) | |||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest | (555 | ) | (46,765 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (18,113 | ) | (293,709 | ) | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(253 | ) | (160,252 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 64,473 | 209,623 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 64,220 | $ | 49,371 | |||||
Supplemental Disclosures Of Cash Flow Information: | |||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | |||||||||
Interest | $ | 50,799 | $ | 18,284 | |||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing: | |||||||||
Accrual of purchases of property and equipment | $ | 2,072 | $ | 228 |
Hostess evaluates performance and allocates resources based on net revenue and gross profit. Information regarding the operations of these reportable segments is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||
(In thousands)
|
September 30,
2016
|
September 30,
2015
|
September 30,
2016
|
September 30,
2015
|
||||||||
Net revenue: | ||||||||||||
Sweet Baked Goods | $ | 173,997 | $ | 154,529 | $ | 507,813 | $ | 467,140 | ||||
Other | 22,200 | 3,684 | 40,945 | 6,649 | ||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 196,197 | $ | 158,213 | $ | 548,758 | $ | 473,789 | ||||
Gross profit: | ||||||||||||
Sweet Baked Goods | $ | 79,697 | $ | 58,420 | $ | 226,208 | $ | 198,784 | ||||
Other | 6,882 | 1,202 | 13,089 | 2,359 | ||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 86,579 | $ | 59,622 | $ | 239,297 | $ | 201,143 | ||||
Fitch: Trump Regulatory Changes May Not Be a Win for Banks
NEW YORK (BUSINESS WIRE) US financial institution (FI) regulatory reform may feature as a
priority legislative agenda item, reflecting the campaign of
President-elect Donald Trump as well as the ongoing views of several key
majority Congressional leaders, says Fitch Ratings.
Fitch does not foresee any changes to US FI ratings as a result of the election. Changes that potentially reduce capital or liquidity requirements are likely to be a negative, but the impact on individual ratings will depend on how banks respond to this change. To the extent that capital or liquidity levels decline materially, that could result in negative rating implications, but Fitch views this scenario as unlikely.
The Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) has featured as a target in President-elect Donald Trump's campaign statements, but most aspects of DFA have been implemented, and it is unclear whether a wholesale repeal could pass or what a partial repeal may encompass.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a relatively high-profile target for those opposed to the DFA, but its elimination on its own would be unlikely to have a material impact for banks in the aggregate. Notably, there has been little specific discussion of peeling back the Volcker Rule or Resolution Authority, some of the more costly aspects of the DFA. Fitch notes that the reduction in proprietary trading activity linked to Volcker has been largely positive for banks, while the resolution process has been largely positive for banks' governance.
Anti-Wall Street sentiment has been a recurring theme in the presidential campaign for both candidates, so it remains an open question as to the likelihood or urgency of any proposed financial sector regulatory reform or repeal. Smaller regional or community banks may be viewed as more worthy beneficiaries of regulatory relief than money center banks. In addition, the reintroduction of Glass-Steagall (GS) is unlikely to be a policy priority. The reintroduction of some elements of GS was included in both parties' platforms, but it was not a prominent theme in the campaign. The industry is likely to continue to strenuously oppose regulation that would re-impose restrictions that had existed under GS.
It is also important to note that capital and liquidity requirements have not historically been dictated by the Legislature but through banking regulators in the US. The US has adopted Basel III and those requirements will continue to be implemented, regardless of the administration. Therefore, while aspects of the DFA may be peeled back, core banking regulation is unlikely to change.
Generally, US financial institutions' performance tends to be correlated with the overall US macroeconomic environment, particularly as it relates to economic growth. Judging by the campaign, the new administration's economic policy is likely to revolve around tax cuts, renegotiating trade agreements, de-regulation and higher infrastructure spending. However, it remains to be seen the degree to which Trump will implement or be able to carry out his policy initiatives and the long-term effect policy changes will have on growth.
In the near term, increased policy uncertainty could dampen prospects for private investment growth. If the Fed judged these effects were likely to outweigh the impact of any additional fiscal easing, it may prompt them to raise rates at a slower pace than previously expected over the coming year. This would delay any positive operating leverage from rate hikes out further, as the impact tends to be lagged. Overall, Fitch expects that incremental interest rate increases would be positive for banks' net interest margins.
Fitch does not foresee any changes to US FI ratings as a result of the election. Changes that potentially reduce capital or liquidity requirements are likely to be a negative, but the impact on individual ratings will depend on how banks respond to this change. To the extent that capital or liquidity levels decline materially, that could result in negative rating implications, but Fitch views this scenario as unlikely.
The Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) has featured as a target in President-elect Donald Trump's campaign statements, but most aspects of DFA have been implemented, and it is unclear whether a wholesale repeal could pass or what a partial repeal may encompass.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a relatively high-profile target for those opposed to the DFA, but its elimination on its own would be unlikely to have a material impact for banks in the aggregate. Notably, there has been little specific discussion of peeling back the Volcker Rule or Resolution Authority, some of the more costly aspects of the DFA. Fitch notes that the reduction in proprietary trading activity linked to Volcker has been largely positive for banks, while the resolution process has been largely positive for banks' governance.
Anti-Wall Street sentiment has been a recurring theme in the presidential campaign for both candidates, so it remains an open question as to the likelihood or urgency of any proposed financial sector regulatory reform or repeal. Smaller regional or community banks may be viewed as more worthy beneficiaries of regulatory relief than money center banks. In addition, the reintroduction of Glass-Steagall (GS) is unlikely to be a policy priority. The reintroduction of some elements of GS was included in both parties' platforms, but it was not a prominent theme in the campaign. The industry is likely to continue to strenuously oppose regulation that would re-impose restrictions that had existed under GS.
It is also important to note that capital and liquidity requirements have not historically been dictated by the Legislature but through banking regulators in the US. The US has adopted Basel III and those requirements will continue to be implemented, regardless of the administration. Therefore, while aspects of the DFA may be peeled back, core banking regulation is unlikely to change.
Generally, US financial institutions' performance tends to be correlated with the overall US macroeconomic environment, particularly as it relates to economic growth. Judging by the campaign, the new administration's economic policy is likely to revolve around tax cuts, renegotiating trade agreements, de-regulation and higher infrastructure spending. However, it remains to be seen the degree to which Trump will implement or be able to carry out his policy initiatives and the long-term effect policy changes will have on growth.
In the near term, increased policy uncertainty could dampen prospects for private investment growth. If the Fed judged these effects were likely to outweigh the impact of any additional fiscal easing, it may prompt them to raise rates at a slower pace than previously expected over the coming year. This would delay any positive operating leverage from rate hikes out further, as the impact tends to be lagged. Overall, Fitch expects that incremental interest rate increases would be positive for banks' net interest margins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)